All the segments in order as you’ve seen it nowhere else: the economic crisis and the trillion dollar bail-out, the need for a bilateral solution and the proposed oversight panel. Sept. 24th, 2008
@milkman52879 would … @milkman52879 would not have been brief, the whole system would have gone down because even foreigners would have dumped the dollar. Don’t fool yourself. Once they dumped the dollar it would be worthless, on top of the economy being bankrupt. There would have to be martial law and the government would likely lose control.
@togowack
If the … @togowack
If the bailouts didn’t pass, there would’ve been a collapse. Some banking institutions would’ve failed, not the entire system. We would’ve had a brief depression, then a period of recovery. The bailouts ensure hyper inflation and the collapse of the dollar.
The liberals / Keynesians got us into this mess. The people who caused our problems are not going to be the ones who solve them.
@togowack
It’s not … @togowack
It’s not a matter of a working mathematical formula, it’s a matter of understanding business cycles and the history of economics. Maybe it shouldn’t take “Austrian economist brain power” to do this, but there’s a severe intellectual diversity issue at hand and the Austrian School has been consistently right about every business cycle since the late 1800s.
@InS0vietRussia you … @InS0vietRussia you think you dont have faith but it takes faith to post a message on youtube and to expect it to show up on this page.
you dont see it, but it does happen while you aren’t looking. faith is believing it without having to see it.
@milkman52879 the … @milkman52879 the whole banking system would have been sucked up into bankruptcy had the mortgage companies not been bailed out. They would have had to recall the mortgages for millions of Americans, who were already bankrupt. It would have caused mass panic and unemployment. Inflation would follow, too, hyper inflation. All because the money these corporations loaned through mortgages didn’t exist, they were giving it out with the authority of the U.S. but without it existing.
@togowack
You have … @togowack
You have been told everything would’ve collapsed if not for the bailouts, and there would’ve been a brief depression, but a crash is inevitable either way. The bailouts are an amped-up version of the cause of our economic woes, and will ensure the collapse of the dollar. The Austrians have been spot on in predicting every major business cycle in the US in modern history. They predicted the great depression, the recession in the 70s, today’s boom and bust, and the dollar’s collapse.
@togowack
You are … @togowack
You are apparently don’t know what you’re referring to when you cite Austrian economists and Keynesians. They are the antithesis of one another. Keynesians believe are more on the liberal end and advocate government spending as a means of economic stimulation, central banking, etc. Austrians advocate truly free markets. Nixon admitted everyone is DC was a Keynesian during his term, and we have been since as have the leaders of other developed nations. This is the problem.
Oh sorry, typo on my part I said Scripture = no valid or scientific merit. I meant to write “Scripture = no historical or scientific merit”. My apologies.
@InS0vietRussia … @InS0vietRussia because it happened in the bible the way it said. At some point you have to believe in that or not because we don’t always know everything
or you can draw whatever conclusion you are comfortable with
scripture (the bible) is also a historical document
I’ve never seen, heard, etc. I just can’t do that because I cannot believe in ‘faith’. Faith literally is the belief without proof; proof though, is something that I need to believe in something. Not to mention that if we go off the supposed timeline of the Bible, the world is only 6,000 to 10,000 years when Science shows that it is not…
your deity at all. Effort and risk to deduce the difference of a craft of man to that and god? Effort has been given in the past and yet it still goes back to the same ideal; the bible was more or less created by sheep-herders in the Bronze Age, yet you all take this said story as proof. Once again, deities were designed to explain things that humankind could not once understand/explain but now can. I don’t claim to know if there is or is not a god but I won’t bow to something that
Sorry, allow me to elaborate on what I was stating about the Egyptian religion. Jesus and Horus’s stories, the virgin birth, following the stars, etc, etc all match up near perfectly. Yet the story of Horus was created before the story of the bible, thus I fail to see how Jesus is not just a crude plagiarism of Horus. Wikipedia it if I failed to get my meaning across. Not to be rude but… Scripture = no valid or scientific merit… I fail to see how that proves the existence of
@InS0vietRussia no, … @InS0vietRussia no, I proved out who my ”diety” is by reading and acting on scripture. Arrogant? I should be, I found God. You should do the same. But it takes effort and risk to know the difference between a craft of man and the one that created everything. He requires something because he is worth it.
I know you have all kinds of philosophies to throw at me now
@InS0vietRussia … @InS0vietRussia thats interesting. Not true, because egyptian religion came in part from the patriarchs. The bible in its current form was never changed, but not always revealed to man.
Who’s to say that your deity is the REAL deity. That is arrogant thinking to believe that your deity is somehow more plausible, more real than any other deity. Not to mention that your ‘God’ has no scientific and DEFINITELY no historical merit. No ‘god’ wrote a book, the bible was a book written in the bronze age. Deities were once thought up; created to explain things that humans could once not explain (i.e. Raining, why the sun rises and sets, etc, etc, etc.) that we now can.
@milkman52879 if … @milkman52879 if you didn’t do the bailouts, the whole system would have collapsed, not just parts of it like in the great depression. It would have meant martial law and anarchy. The dollar would be worthless and the worlds reserve currency gone. Austrian economics and Keynesian have their heads up their asses. no competent economist really agrees with it and foreign governments have spoken against it strongly.
@milkman52879 most … @milkman52879 most of the current deficit and almost everything Obama is hiking onto the national debt is discretionary spending. It’s saying much more than bailouts.
@togowack
Regarding … @togowack
Regarding your comment on conservatives, you are incorrect. Fiscal conservatives did not endorse the bailouts. The reason this matters is Palin is selling herself as a conservative when she clearly is not, much the same way the Neo-Cons hijacked the GOP. In a 2 party system when one side is supposed to be a check and balance to the other, there is no balance if both sides are left of center. Palin might make more sense regarding discretionary spending, but that’s not saying much…..
All the segments in order as you’ve seen it nowhere else: the economic crisis and the trillion dollar bail-out, the need for a bilateral solution and the proposed oversight panel. Sept. 24th, 2008
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@milkman52879 would …
@milkman52879 would not have been brief, the whole system would have gone down because even foreigners would have dumped the dollar. Don’t fool yourself. Once they dumped the dollar it would be worthless, on top of the economy being bankrupt. There would have to be martial law and the government would likely lose control.
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
The people …
The people responding on this page have better insight in the financial woes,then Palin.
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@togowack
If the …
@togowack
If the bailouts didn’t pass, there would’ve been a collapse. Some banking institutions would’ve failed, not the entire system. We would’ve had a brief depression, then a period of recovery. The bailouts ensure hyper inflation and the collapse of the dollar.
The liberals / Keynesians got us into this mess. The people who caused our problems are not going to be the ones who solve them.
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@togowack
It’s not …
@togowack
It’s not a matter of a working mathematical formula, it’s a matter of understanding business cycles and the history of economics. Maybe it shouldn’t take “Austrian economist brain power” to do this, but there’s a severe intellectual diversity issue at hand and the Austrian School has been consistently right about every business cycle since the late 1800s.
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
haydencrawfish1 …
haydencrawfish1 Lmao…
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@InS0vietRussia you …
@InS0vietRussia you think you dont have faith but it takes faith to post a message on youtube and to expect it to show up on this page.
you dont see it, but it does happen while you aren’t looking. faith is believing it without having to see it.
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@InS0vietRussia …
@InS0vietRussia makes no difference what you said
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@milkman52879 it …
@milkman52879 it shouldn’t take austrian economist brain power to do this
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@milkman52879 the …
@milkman52879 the whole banking system would have been sucked up into bankruptcy had the mortgage companies not been bailed out. They would have had to recall the mortgages for millions of Americans, who were already bankrupt. It would have caused mass panic and unemployment. Inflation would follow, too, hyper inflation. All because the money these corporations loaned through mortgages didn’t exist, they were giving it out with the authority of the U.S. but without it existing.
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@milkman52879 no …
@milkman52879 no overall mathematical formula works
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@togowack
You have …
@togowack
You have been told everything would’ve collapsed if not for the bailouts, and there would’ve been a brief depression, but a crash is inevitable either way. The bailouts are an amped-up version of the cause of our economic woes, and will ensure the collapse of the dollar. The Austrians have been spot on in predicting every major business cycle in the US in modern history. They predicted the great depression, the recession in the 70s, today’s boom and bust, and the dollar’s collapse.
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@togowack
You are …
@togowack
You are apparently don’t know what you’re referring to when you cite Austrian economists and Keynesians. They are the antithesis of one another. Keynesians believe are more on the liberal end and advocate government spending as a means of economic stimulation, central banking, etc. Austrians advocate truly free markets. Nixon admitted everyone is DC was a Keynesian during his term, and we have been since as have the leaders of other developed nations. This is the problem.
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@InS0vietRussia
…
@InS0vietRussia
Oh sorry, typo on my part I said Scripture = no valid or scientific merit. I meant to write “Scripture = no historical or scientific merit”. My apologies.
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@InS0vietRussia …
@InS0vietRussia because it happened in the bible the way it said. At some point you have to believe in that or not because we don’t always know everything
or you can draw whatever conclusion you are comfortable with
scripture (the bible) is also a historical document
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@togowack
I’ve …
@togowack
I’ve never seen, heard, etc. I just can’t do that because I cannot believe in ‘faith’. Faith literally is the belief without proof; proof though, is something that I need to believe in something. Not to mention that if we go off the supposed timeline of the Bible, the world is only 6,000 to 10,000 years when Science shows that it is not…
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@togowack
your …
@togowack
your deity at all. Effort and risk to deduce the difference of a craft of man to that and god? Effort has been given in the past and yet it still goes back to the same ideal; the bible was more or less created by sheep-herders in the Bronze Age, yet you all take this said story as proof. Once again, deities were designed to explain things that humankind could not once understand/explain but now can. I don’t claim to know if there is or is not a god but I won’t bow to something that
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@togowack
Sorry, …
@togowack
Sorry, allow me to elaborate on what I was stating about the Egyptian religion. Jesus and Horus’s stories, the virgin birth, following the stars, etc, etc all match up near perfectly. Yet the story of Horus was created before the story of the bible, thus I fail to see how Jesus is not just a crude plagiarism of Horus. Wikipedia it if I failed to get my meaning across. Not to be rude but… Scripture = no valid or scientific merit… I fail to see how that proves the existence of
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@InS0vietRussia I …
@InS0vietRussia I found God but let me tell you it gets no easier after that
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@InS0vietRussia no, …
@InS0vietRussia no, I proved out who my ”diety” is by reading and acting on scripture. Arrogant? I should be, I found God. You should do the same. But it takes effort and risk to know the difference between a craft of man and the one that created everything. He requires something because he is worth it.
I know you have all kinds of philosophies to throw at me now
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@InS0vietRussia …
@InS0vietRussia thats interesting. Not true, because egyptian religion came in part from the patriarchs. The bible in its current form was never changed, but not always revealed to man.
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@togowack
Hell, …
@togowack
Hell, your bible is practically a crude plagiarism of the Egyptian religion.
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@togowack
Who’s …
@togowack
Who’s to say that your deity is the REAL deity. That is arrogant thinking to believe that your deity is somehow more plausible, more real than any other deity. Not to mention that your ‘God’ has no scientific and DEFINITELY no historical merit. No ‘god’ wrote a book, the bible was a book written in the bronze age. Deities were once thought up; created to explain things that humans could once not explain (i.e. Raining, why the sun rises and sets, etc, etc, etc.) that we now can.
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@milkman52879 if …
@milkman52879 if you didn’t do the bailouts, the whole system would have collapsed, not just parts of it like in the great depression. It would have meant martial law and anarchy. The dollar would be worthless and the worlds reserve currency gone. Austrian economics and Keynesian have their heads up their asses. no competent economist really agrees with it and foreign governments have spoken against it strongly.
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@milkman52879 most …
@milkman52879 most of the current deficit and almost everything Obama is hiking onto the national debt is discretionary spending. It’s saying much more than bailouts.
July 11th, 2010 at 6:45 pm
@togowack
Regarding …
@togowack
Regarding your comment on conservatives, you are incorrect. Fiscal conservatives did not endorse the bailouts. The reason this matters is Palin is selling herself as a conservative when she clearly is not, much the same way the Neo-Cons hijacked the GOP. In a 2 party system when one side is supposed to be a check and balance to the other, there is no balance if both sides are left of center. Palin might make more sense regarding discretionary spending, but that’s not saying much…..