TYT Network (new WTF?! channel): http://www.youtube.com/user/whattheflickshow
Follow TYT on Twitter: https://twitter.com/theyoungturks
Join the TYT Facebook Fan Page: http://tinyurl.com/yblkjqr
Follow TYT on Google Buzz: http://www.google.com/profiles/tytnationhq
Check Out TYT Interviews http://www.youtube.com/user/TYTInterviews
Watch more at http://www.theyoungturks.com
Duration : 0:4:45
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/theyoungturks
Check Out TYT Interviews http://www.youtube.com/user/TYTInterviews
Watch more at http://www.theyoungturks.com
Duration : 0:3:31
A deadly combination.
BOOK OF VIDEO TRANSCRIPTS NOW AVAILABLE
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback/godless-and-free/7864233
You can download an audio version of this video at http://patcondell.libsyn.com/
Duration : 0:5:16
[][][] Good Guy [][][] ™
Allah Muhammad PBUH Islam Quran Kaaba Madina Aaj Tv Geo Tv Dawn Tv BBC CNN Urdu Panjabi Ary Oneworld Ptv Fox Tv Capital Talk Live With Talat MQM PML PPP ANP PTI Altaf Hussain Nawaz Sharif Shahbaz Sharif Maulana Fazlul Rehman Qazi 12th May Carnage Hostage Crash Accident Science Mystery Magic Pakistan Pak India US UK Karachi Lahore Islamabad Afghanistan NewYork Earthquake Storm Nasa Cricket Soccer Hockey Salman Khan Shahrukh Khan Aamir Khan Tom Cruise US President Imran Khan George W Bush Hallary Clinton Obama Osama Bin Laden 911 Pentagon Plane Crash Candidates Rail Accident Birds View Pallution George Galloway Chaudry Shujat Good Guy Girls Bollywood Hollywood China Beijing Olympic Pakistan Gulf UAE Dubai Iraq Pelistine US Army NATO Politics Dr Shahid Masood Talat Chief Justice Iftikhar Supreme Court Debate Petorl Gas Prices Automobiles Reporter Press Conference Australia Japan Tokyo Nagasaki Hiroshima ND Tv Star Plus Amitabh Israel Fraud Hoax Russia EU Europe Canada Mexico Vetican City Pope Terrorist Taliban Alqaeda Al qaeda Moque Heavy Target Missile Suicide Bomber Fighter Plane Atom Physics Math Illusion New Old Myth Weird Minister General Pervez Musharraf Benazir Bhutoo Asif Ali Zardari Shoiab Akhter Shahid Afridi Pathan Uncle Jerk Date Chance People Blogs Entertainment Comedians Directors Gurus Musicians Partners Sponsors TV channel Top Internet TV Autos & Vehicles Comedy Entertainment Film & Animation Gadgets & Games Howto & DIY Music News & Politics People & Blogs Pets & Animals Sports Travel & Places Youtube Bribe Karachi Rain Traitor Goverment Government WebImages Video News Maps Gmail Yahoo Hotmail MSN Chat Chatting Messenger News Money ! # $ % * window Vista Sony Gang Blood Halicopter Drugs Drug Katrina Kaif Star Plus Zeetv Prime Minister Press Conference Savings PC Lapto Intel Dell Advertisement Commercial UFO Fire Attack Dictator Teacher Nobel Politicians Politicians UNO WHO Cable Police Investigation Army Meray Mutabiq Independence Quaid e Azam Top Ten Wonders Of The World Browsing Students Institute Corruption Modretor Exhibition G8 Summit War Against Terror Attack Global Brasil France Ireland Italia 日 Nederland Polska España United Kingdom My Account History Microsoft Bill gates
Duration : 0:5:45
At the recent 5-day Integral Institute seminar on Integral Business Leadership,
Ken Wilber was asked, by a senior Zen teacher, “What do you think of the Republican convention?”
Ken responded by giving an overview of what a truly integral politics might look like, and used that to compare and contrast with the Democratic and Republican conventions, both of which are less-than-integral. We think that this twenty-minute summary is brilliant, insightful, deadly serious, and wickedly funny, all at once. But by all accounts it is an extraordinary account of why all politics today are considerably less-than-integral, along with certain features that almost certainly would have to be included in the future in any truly integral politics.
In this synopsis, Ken focuses on three items that all political theories have attempted to address but none have managed to fully integrate. These are the tension between (1) the individual and the collective; (2) the source of the cause of human suffering: is the individual primarily to blame or is the society primarily to blame?; and (3) the different levels of development that the different political parties tend to represent: any truly integral politics would include and represent all of them, and yet how on earth do you do that?
Due to time considerations, Ken did not discuss two other equally important ingredients in any integral politics. One. In representational democracies, people have a right to be at whatever stage of development they are at, and generally speaking, within free speech, a right to express the values of whatever stage they are at. Traditional-fundamentalist (blue) has a right to be traditional, modernist (orange) has a right to be modernist, postmodernist (green) has a right to be postmodernist, and so on. This is generally modified in practice, to the extent that the center of gravity of a culture will tend to impose its values on others, especially if they are first-tier (or less-than-integral) values. Nonetheless, in democratic societies, there’s a general background understanding that people have a right to be, and a right to express, whatever stage they are or whatever belief system they possess.
Two. They do not, however, have a right to act on those beliefs. This is generally handled in representative democracies by a separation of public and private, and by a similar if more specific principle of the separation of church and state. This means that, for example, in the privacy of my blue-meme mind, I am free to believe that Jesus Christ is my personal savior and that nobody achieves salvation without a belief in Jesus. In public behavior, however, I am not allowed to burn at the stake somebody who disagrees with me. In terms of integral psychology, this means in the interior of an individual (i.e., the upper left), the person can believe whatever they like; but in their public behavior (i.e., the upper right), they must behave according to laws drawn from a worldcentric or higher level of development (lower left), or else they are charged with civil or criminal behavior and removed from society if necessary (lower right).
This separation of church and state, or more generally what Max Weber called the differentiation of the values spheres, is one of the great and enduring contributions of the Western enlightenment, a contribution almost entirely misunderstood by extreme postmodernists, who in fact are operating under its protection while bitterly condemning it.
(The most common version of this is the aggressive attempt to reduce “I” and “It” to “We,’ or the attempt to reduce art and science to a social construction, which can therefore be deconstructed. As it turns out, this reductionism presumes precisely what it denies, but then, deconstructive postmodernism has been little without its performative contradictions.)
A truly integral politics exists nowhere on the planet at this time, principally because not enough individuals have emerged at the integral levels of consciousness, and hence no governments anywhere have integral representatives as members (except rarely and by accident). Its principal challenge is to create some form of governance that allows each stage to be itself within the constraints of not harming others (i.e., to let red be red, and blue be blue, and orange be orange, and green be green, etc—precisely because, as we saw, this is a right in virtually all free societies), and yet to govern from the highest, widest, deepest, and most encompassing levels of development emerged to date (starting at yellow). Most representative democracies do this anyway, except their center of gravity is not yet fully integral, and they do it implicitly, not explicitly.
Duration : 0:17:45
Despite Y2K panic at the beginning of the decade, the first ten years of the new millennium proved that our fellow humans are much more dangerous than malfunctioning machines. Unprecedented terrorist attacks on American soil, followed by subsequent attacks around the world punctuated the 2000s. Climate change and unparalleled natural disasters killed hundreds of thousands. Not to mention the global economic meltdown. To finish it off, the world was scared to death by the swine flu pandemic the perfect end to a dreadful decade. In this video, http://www.WatchMojo.com reviews these and more milestones from the first decade of the new millennium.
Duration : 0:4:59
Ventura rants on fox I have no opinion on him clearly he’s better opinionated than factual
Fox News Reports
Subscribe Subscribe Subscribe
Support your conservatives and keep us strong!
Duration : 0:5:5
THe Downfall of the Republicans
sarah palin, john mccain, george bush
Duration : 0:5:7
Please rate and comment and send this video to all your contacts 
http://www.InfoWars.com
http://www.PrisonPlanet.com
It is very important for us all to realise that we’re living under a simple but clever system that has been designed to contain revolution whilst projecting the illusion of being a free, fair and open democracy. The 2-party system provides firm support for the elite to implement their agenda from the top down, whilst the ordinary people at the grassroots level squabble between themselves over which political party is the best. In reality, it doesn’t matter which of the two parties you vote for because the same agenda will unfold regardless. Hence, both parties are controlled at the very top by the same force.
Oh yeah, YouTube, please stop censoring the view counters on these videos, it is beyond obvious now and just about every YouTube user knows that you fiddle the view counters to keep videos like this off the most-viewed lists. Why bother when it is just so blatantly obvious?
http://www.InfoWars.com
http://www.PrisonPlanet.com
_
Duration : 0:5:51
A quick explanation of American politics.